Select Page

Hillary Clinton Expresses Interest In Challenging 2016 Election Results

Hillary Clinton Expresses Interest In Challenging 2016 Election Results

Seems Hillary almost a year later still refuses to concede that she was defeated in the election, after hearing every excuse, from the Russians, to space aliens effected her rightful place as president, she now is saying she may take a new tact.

Apparently, she questioned the legitimacy of the election.

The unsuccessful Democrat presidential nominee said she “would not” rule out the possibility of filing a legal challenge against President Donald Trump’s election victory.

During an NPR interview, she was asked if she would “rule out questioning the legitimacy of this election if” the accusations against the president are true. She said: “No, I would not.”

According to Western Journalism, Hillary confessed that this legal challenge will be hard. She said: “I don’t know if there’s any legal constitutional way to do that.”

She continued: “Basically I don’t believe there are (any legal means). There are scholars, academics, who have arguments that it would be, but I don’t think they’re on strong ground. But people are making those arguments. I just don’t think we have a mechanism.”

Ken Klukowski, the senior legal editor of Breitbart explained that this lawsuit could be dismissed very easy. He wrote: “Each of the states that together gave President Trump 304 Electoral College votes — with only 270 votes constituting a winning majority — did so consistent with their state law.” He continued: “Each state has a mechanism for challenging the election result only within a limited time-frame, and Clinton failed to do so. Therefore no court would entertain her untimely assertion of any challenge.”

Personally, I think this is more an act of trying to say she challenged this, once more she will blame the fact that she was thwarted on someone else, even though she knew she had a time limit to challenge the election and had not.

Hillary Clinton declared something cruel this week. Apparently, she questioned the legitimacy of the election. The unsuccessful Democrat presidential nominee said she “would not” rule out the possibility of filing a legal challenge against President Donald Trump’s election victory.

During an NPR interview, she was asked if she would “rule out questioning the legitimacy of this election if” the accusations against the president are true. She said: “No, I would not.” 

According to Western Journalism, Hillary confessed that this legal challenge will be hard. She said: “I don’t know if there’s any legal constitutional way to do that.” She continued: “Basically I don’t believe there are (any legal means). There are scholars, academics, who have arguments that it would be, but I don’t think they’re on strong ground. But people are making those arguments. I just don’t think we have a mechanism.”

Ken Klukowski, the senior legal editor of Breitbart explained that this lawsuit could be dismissed very easy. He wrote: “Each of the states that together gave President Trump 304 Electoral College votes — with only 270 votes constituting a winning majority — did so consistent with their state law.” He continued: “Each state has a mechanism for challenging the election result only within a limited timeframe, and Clinton failed to do so. Therefore no court would entertain her untimely assertion of any challenge.”

Furthermore, Hillary explained her distrust toward the president, mainly because of his response to the accusations that the Russian connected with Trump and brought victory in the presidential election.

Hillary stated: “Let me just put it this way, if I had lost the popular vote but won the Electoral College and in my first day as president the intelligence community came to me and said, ‘The Russians influenced the election,’ I would’ve never stood for it.”

She continued: “Even though it might’ve advantaged me, I would’ve said, ‘We’ve got to get to the bottom of this.’ I would’ve set up an independent commission with subpoena power and everything else.”

Seems she forgot that she had sent her operatives in to collect foreign files on Trump, not that they had any truth in them, also sent operatives to work with another Russian ally in trying to dig up dirt on President Trump, guess like much else in her life, when she does it that is perfectly acceptable, when she thinks others may have done the same, not that they did, then she is the first to cry out in outrage. We have Ukrainian official embassy official Andrii Telizhenko saying that the embassy was additionally with “the Hillary team” itself, this naturally like all else the Clinton’s done is pushed to the side, it’s almost expected, so why bother.

Guess in the end she will keep blaming others, what we find out is she dealt a blow to the DNC that they may find themselves taking a long time to recover, we saw in the last elections, in every runoff since then, people may not like Trump or the RNC, but they dislike the DNC even more. The polling means nothing, the problem is if someone dares to say they support Trump or his policies the media machine goes into overdrive to discredit and attack, so people now say nothing, then as we saw on election day end up voting in a way that defies polling. One has to wonder, will the DNC ever pick themselves up, or will they continue to respond by going further and further to the left, thus alienating the center right and center left in this country, these are the people whom after all decide elections.

About The Author

Timothy Benton

Author has studied Middle East History for the last 35 years, am a lifetime student of history. Has an interest in sports, tech, history and political events. Works as a Republican political commentator who looks at events from a conservative's perspective.

Leave a reply

Specify Facebook App ID and Secret in Super Socializer > Social Login section in admin panel for Facebook Login to work